Why Islam Hates Us

Gen. James Green

W E’VE HEARD this over and over, ever since 9/11: “They hate us because we are rich!” No, dumb kafir!, Islam does not hate us (Americans) because we are rich; they hate us because their books tell them to HATE US!! There have been endless discussions and debates over “WHY,” but only a precious FEW ever hit the target—Islam teaches world domination (see my many articles).

Ignorance is not an option and definitely not an excuse. Read Islam’s Qur’an and Hadiths (Volumes; the Sunna of Muhammad). There are many collectors of hadiths, but the 2 most authoritative collectors were Muhammad Ibn Ismail Al-Bukhari (or “Bukhari”) and Abu Al-Husayn Muslim (or “Muslim”), Bukhari’s Hadith has 6,800 hadiths. Be warned, many Muslim scholars do not believe in all of them. Some are totally outrageous! As for the Qur’an, there are also many versions, but I like Yusuf Ali’s translation with his footnotes.

IN REALITY, ISLAM IS EVIL IN THE NAME OF ALLAH! There are hundreds of Suras (chapters and verses in the Qur’an, read like a recipe book, that give Muslims license to murder/kill, torture, commit sexual debauchery, slavery, deceit/lying, and subjugation of ENTIRE societies. This is what both the Qur’an and Hadith teach. One converted Muslim (to Christianity) has said, “The Qur’an is the most evil, vilest book ever written in human history…and Islam is a total and complete rejection of (the Biblical) God…” Both books unabashedly address the terrors and horrors of Muhammad’s lifestyle and the subsequent evil directives of Muhammad’s Qur’an.

ORTHODOX Islam

AGAIN, it is (mostly) Western nations that divide Islam up into “peaceful” / “tolerant” and “radical” / “intolerant” camps. But what I know by researching their books, is that the “peaceful” Suras have been ABROGATED [overrode] and replaced with the “war” Suras—hence, the WAR to spread Islam by and with the SWORD!!

So, orthodox Islam IS VIOLENT; it IS WHOLLY intolerant of freedom of thought (controlled by Sharia) and expression as well as any freedom to choose…whether it is your religion, political inclination or sexual orientation...Sharia CONTROLS them ALL!

This Islamic “Orthodoxy” works globally if allowed to. See how STUPID these Western nations are—to submit to this evil—all in the name of “Political Correctness.” Muslims may start out (posing) as submissive to a host nation (when small in number), then, as they grow, they apply extreme violence to achieve their ultimate goal of ABSOLUTE CONTROL. Many nations, as I write this (Sept., 2016) are playing directly into the Muslim’s hands—like trusting lambs/sheep, being (literally) sent to the slaughter.

Fight or Be Overtaken

THIS IS WHAT I believe: fight or be overtaken! The fight for the Christian believers is to expose Islam’s real character and publish it: verbally or otherwise, just do it...this will prevent others from being captured by Islam. Tell the world what Sharia (law) teaches—the ideology of Islam.

Sitting on your butts is not an option in this war: Attack is!! Don’t forget, those “peaceful” Suras have been replaced by the “Sword” Suras.

The Pope

WE HAVE REPRINTED an article about pope Francis’ (stupid) statement “…it is wrong to equate violence with Islam…I do not believe that it is true or right that Islam is terrorist.” Here we have a first-class liar—he knows that Islam is “terrorist” AND “violent” (see 2 Faces of Islam series, issue 9, p. 8). That (stupid) statement did not set well with many Roman Catholics.

While it is true that Mary (Jesus’ mother) is spoken highly of in the Qur’an (see Sura 3:42), the Roman Catholic Church has used this (and other Suras) to tell the faithful Catholics that, as Saint Louis DeMontfort (1673-1716), who was named Missionary Apostolic by Pope Clement XI, stated:

“The power of Mary over all devils will be particularly outstanding in the last period of time. She will extend the Kingdom of Christ over the idolaters and Moslems, and there will come a glorious era in which Mary will be the ruler and Queen of human hearts” (see Dupont, Catholic Prophecy p. 33; Connor, Prophecy for Today, p. 49). We wonder where Jesus is? If this is not “Idolatry” I’ll eat my beret!

In DeMontfort’s book, “True Devotion to Mary,” the following is one such passage not included by Dupont or Connor in their books:

“Mary must shine forth more than ever in mercy, in might and in grace, in these latter times:

in mercy, to bring back and lovingly receive the poor strayed sinners who shall be converted and shall return to the Catholic Church;

in might, against the enemies of God, idolaters, schismatics, Mahometans, Jews and souls hardened in impiety, who shall rise in terrible revolt against God to seduce all those who shall oppose them and to make them fall by promises and threats;

and finally, she must shine forth in grace, in order to animate and sustain the valiant soldiers and faithful servants of Jesus Christ, who shall battle for His interests.” (See note. 50, and 6 [p. 29 of edition published by TAN Books in 1985]).

Saint Louis predicted the ultimate demise of Islam specifically through the intervention of “Our Lady!” Guess we’ll wait and see.

Enter F. Sheen

ARCHBISHOP SHEEN’S book, “The World’s First Love,” has this to say:

“It is our firm belief that the fears some entertain concerning the Muslims are not to be realized, but that Islam, instead, will eventually be converted to Christianity—and in a way that even some of our missionaries never suspect. It is our belief that this will happen not through the direct teaching of Christianity but through a summoning of Muslims to a veneration of the Mother of God.”

He goes on to explain that although Muslims vehemently reject the divinity of Christ, they ironically have great devotion to His Mother. In fact, there is a verse in the Quran that seems to imply belief in the Immaculate Conception, which he quotes: “Oh, Mary, Allah has chosen you and purified you, and elected you above all the women of the earth.” [Surah 3:42]

Finally, Archbishop Sheen makes a crucial connection between the conversion of Muslims and Our Lady of Fatima: “Mary, then, is for the Muslims the true Sayyida, or Lady. The only possible serious rival to her in their creed would be Fatima, the daughter of Mohammad himself. ... Since nothing ever happens out of Heaven except with a finesse of all details, I believe that the Blessed Virgin chose to be known as “Our Lady of Fatima” as a pledge and sign of hope to the Muslim people and as an assurance that they, who show her so much respect, will one day accept her Divine Son, too. ... Missionaries in the future will, more and more, see that their apostolate among the Muslims will be successful in the measure that they preach Our Lady of Fatima” (see Sheen, The World’s First Love, p. 205; Ibid, p. 206; ibid, p. 206-208).

Fatima Crusader (FC)

IN THE FATIMA Crusader’s issue 116 (2016), there is an article called MURDER in the Magic Kingdom, speaking about Nasrudin (a comic character in the Middle Eastern folklore). The story underscores a common failing: a desire to avoid difficulties by pretending that the “real” problem is elsewhere, where easier (but false) solutions can be found. The article is compared to Islam.

This failing is repeatedly on display following the endless parade of bombings, shootings, stabbings and assorted atrocities preceded by the cry of “Allahu Akbar!” The article goes on to say that whenever an act of savagery is visited upon The West by Muslims (who follow the dictates of the Qur’an), our dumb/PC leaders of Church and state can always be found looking for something that isn’t there! Why, I ask, don’t they have eyes to see that these “atrocities” are commands right out of the Muslim’s HATEFUL book(s)!?

The truth of it is simple: the key to these vicious and bloody attacks THAT IS ISLAM ITSELF!!: not merely “radical” / “militant” / “ISIS” or what-have-you kind of Islam (too many think that the above are NOT Islamic/Muslim, but psychos using Islam). The truth is, and this Catholic article says so quite truthfully, that Islam is to blame, “not ‘radical’ Islam, or some aberrant ‘interpretation’ that distorts Islam (the ‘religion of peace’), but Islam itself.” At least the FC has that correct. But, even as a Roman Catholic publication, it certainly does disagrees with their silly-dress-wearing pope!

The Problem

THE BIG PROBLEM with all this “Islam is not violent, but peaceful” rhetoric is that it is not true. Islam’s teachings from the Qur’an and Hadith orders, promotes, and commands violence (see our “2 Faces of Islam” magazines and “The Offensive War to Spread Islam”—free).

“There is no act of Islamic terror,” the article states, “that cannot find its provenance in one of the Suras (Chapters) of Muhammad’s book, or in the Hadith, the sayings and acts of the (false) prophet.” The dictates are accepted as GUIDING PRINCIPLES in Islam.

While the majority of Muslims, I contend, are not violent (well, at least not yet), nevertheless, they are still Muslims. These “peaceful” Muslims cling to those abrogated Suras; the saying and deeds of their (false) prophet must be taken at face value…and no perpetrator of these bloody incidents ever cites as his motivation anything other than his/her allegiance to Islam. They cite no other book or prophet.

The Disturbing Truth

OUR FC article goes on to state:

“The attempt to suggest a moral equivalence between “radical” Christians and “radical” Muslims is preposterous, but that has not stopped Pope or President from attempting such ridiculous comparisons. And when was the last time you read or heard of someone shouting “Praise Jesus Christ” before driving a car bomb into a building or cutting off the head of a non-believer? That Islam is now unique among the world’s religions in its espousal of murder as a holy duty is a dark and disturbing truth.”

So, naturally, our leaders look for answers where the light is better: that is, where the truth is not, for the truth compels us to address a reality that has been assiduously avoided for a very long time in the West. C.S. Lewis, commenting on the modern age’s attempt to embrace all alternatives and thus avoid any conflict or confrontation, wrote the following in “The Great Divorce”:

“The attempt is based on the belief that reality never presents us with an absolutely unavoidable “either-or;” that, granted skill and patience and (above all) time enough, some way of embracing both alternatives can always be found; that mere development or adjustment or refinement will somehow turn evil into good without our being called on for a final and total rejection of anything we should like to retain. This belief I take to be a disastrous error. You cannot take all luggage with you on all journeys; on one journey even your right hand and your right eye may be among the things you have to leave behind.”

If this desire for an impossible conciliation of radically opposed forces was prominent in Lewis’ day, it has become an overarching preoccupation, to the point of absurdity, in our time.

The Forces

NO MATTER the name (or acronyms)—ISIS / ISIL / Al-Qaeda / Taliban / Al-Shabab / Boko Haram etc....all are ISLAM.

And what the West needs to come to grips with is that Islam is divided up into two houses: “the house of peace” and “the house of WAR.” The first cannot become a reality UNTIL the second has played out its role, either converting the entire world to Islam, or eradicating the world by force!...then “peace” will prevail; no more enemies to Islam. Their books teach this. Research it for yourself.

You see, Islam is at WAR with the whole world, not just the “rich” nations like the U.S. and European nations.

The FC goes on to state:

“And here’s the big one: We, the nations of the West, would have to admit that religion matters. We would have to say plainly that how a culture conceives its God can have profound implications on how its people live and act. Acknowledging the truth about Islam would compel us to face hard truths about ourselves, about the Western way of life and its underlying assumptions.

It is presently assumed that religion is a purely private matter, and that it should remain so. Further, it is an article of public faith that those who profess religious beliefs should refrain from judging the behavior of those who do not. The abiding controversy over abortion highlights the absurdity of these assumptions. If I believe that abortion is murder, but you do not, then as a matter of good manners in our democratic republic it is incumbent upon me to allow you to commit murder with good grace and forbearance.”

THE ARTICLE CONTINUES:

“Tolerance as an absolute principle is unworkable. How can an apostle of tolerance be tolerant of the intolerant? Even John Locke saw the problem, which is why he thought Catholics socially unacceptable: they insist upon an absolute truth. The essence of tolerance is indifference, if not practical denial, of absolute truth.

Islam has in common with the Catholic Faith its insistence on ABSOLUTE TRUTH, that is, exclusive truth. So Islam and Catholicism are inevitable foes, as they have been since the first cry of “Allahu Akbar!” accompanied the first beheading of an “infidel” more than 1300 years ago. (End Quote)

So, according to Islam, Islam can’t change, hence, a DARK, BLOODY ideology rooted in 7th century ideology!

The Fatima Crusader believes that Islam eventually will be converted to Catholicism. The late Bishop Fulton Sheen believed that “Our Lady appeared at Fatima as a sign that Islam would be converted.” I don’t know which religion is the most deceived. I don’t ever recall reading in our Holy Bible that “Our Lady” (Mary) would be the End Time Savior; I READ IT IS JESUS ONLY. And I surely do not read where a “sinful” man like Muhammad would be humanity’s Savior either. All this ADORATION of Mary and Muhammad is really sickening. It would do well for both Muslims and Roman Catholics to REPENT of their rebellion, pride, and idolatry.

Both Islam and the Roman Catholic Church believe that they are right; both believe that each other is “of the devil!”

The poor Roman Catholics (at least those who worship Mary) believe, and I quote from the FC: “Mary began salvation, and by her intercession it will be completed. Before the second coming of Christ, Mary, more than ever, must shine in mercy, might, and grace in order to bring unbelievers into the Catholic faith.” The article finishes by stating that the “power of Mary in the latter days will be very conspicuous. Mary will extend the reign of Christ over the heathens and the Mohammedans, and it will be a time of great joy when Mary is enthroned as Mistress and Queen of Heaven.”

Lest the PC pope forgets, let me remind him that:

“Islamic terrorists stormed a Catholic Church during Mass near the Normandy city of Rouen—taking worshipers hostage, murdering an 84-year-old priest by slitting his throat while chanting “Allahu Akbar!” and leaving a nun fighting for her life.”